Research found at least three air fryers which wanted to know personal information about users
Most of us are used to certain devices listening to us nowadays and even get annoyed when they don’t hear us properly, but the air fryer typically isn’t included in that group.
They’re brilliant creations, but we don’t usually rely on them to play music or find out the latest news headlines, so why would they need to listen to us?
Well, it all comes down to one thing that many tech companies covet from their customers: data.
Research conducted by consumer advice company Which? found evidence of ‘excessive smart device surveillance’, including instances in which air fryers had ‘demanded’ permission to listen in on conversations.
The study looked at three air fryers made by the Chinese brands Xiaomi, Tencent, and Aigostar, and found that the devices wanted permission from the customer to record audio using their phone.
Customers were not given a specified reason as to why the cooking implements wanted to record the audio, however Which? noted that both the Aigostar and Xiaomi fryers flagged in their privacy notices that they sent people’s personal data to servers in China.
The research also found that the app for the Xiaomi fryer linked to trackers from Facebook, as well as the ad network Pangle, which is used on TikTok for Business. Depending on the location of the user, the fryer could also connect to the Chinese tech giant Tencent.
Additional information requested by the Aigostar air fryer included the gender and date of birth of the owner, however the response to this was optional. All three devices also wanted to know the precise location of the customer using the air fryer.
When contacted by UNILAD, Aigostar responded to say that Aigostar air fryers ‘do not have any recording capability’, adding: “We do not collect audio data from our devices.”
It also clarified that location permissions are used ‘solely for Wi-Fi setup, enabling device connectivity’, and that ‘users have complete control and can choose to decline this permission’.
“While some general information is listed in our privacy policy, we are actively streamlining our data practices to ensure we only request necessary information,” the company added.
“We respect user control over their data. Aigostar allows users to delete their accounts at any time, and upon account deletion, all associated data is permanently removed from our servers. Customers can find more information about our privacy policies [here].
“Our Privacy Policy outlines all data practices. Users are fully informed of permissions during app setup and can choose to accept or decline. Aigostar remains committed to upholding the highest standards of privacy and data protection.”
Commenting on the Which? findings, Harry Rose, Which? magazine editor, said: “Our research shows how smart tech manufacturers and the firms they work with are currently able to collect data from consumers, seemingly with reckless abandon, and this is often done with little or no transparency.”
Rose noted that Which? had been ‘calling for proper guidelines outlining what is expected of smart product manufacturers’, and the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has confirmed that it will issue new guidance in spring 2025 on how to comply with data protection laws.
Stephen Almond, executive director of regulatory risk at the ICO, issued a warning in the wake of the news, stressing the consumers are not necessarily only paying with money when they buy certain products.
Speaking to Sky News, he said: “Ultimately, what we’re seeing is actually consumers paying twice. Paying first for the product that they’re buying, but then second, paying with their data.
“And that data is being used potentially for targeted advertising, also gathering more information about how the market is developing in this sort of area. So it’s really important if these devices are to be used with trust by people, that the industry comes clean around how people’s information is being used.”
